An 80/10/10 splits the purchase into a first mortgage at 80% of value, a second at 10%, and 10% down — avoiding mortgage insurance by keeping the first loan at 80% LTV. Whether it beats one loan with PMI depends on the second loan's rate against the premium you avoid, and on how long you keep it.
What this calculator is actually comparing
Both paths buy the same house with the same cash down, so both start from the same total debt. What differs is how that debt is arranged and what it costs.
This tool runs two complete amortisations against a third and reports which structure costs less and from which month. That last part matters more than the headline: the answer often flips partway through the loan, because PMI is temporary and a second mortgage is not.
Its PMI input starts at 0.55% of the loan a year, and you can change it. Our PMI calculator no longer uses a single rate: it prices PMI from a published mortgage-insurer rate card by loan-to-value and credit score. At this tool's default 10% down on a loan over 20 years, that card charges 0.28% a year at 760+, 0.55% at 700–719 (the 0.55% starting value) and 0.94% at 620–639 — so enter the rate for your own score. Both tools drop the premium on the same convention — 80% of the ORIGINAL value, not of a re-appraised one.
Why the rate environment decides this
The piggyback wins when the extra interest on the second loan costs less than the mortgage insurance it avoids. That comparison moves with rates, and it moves against the piggyback when rates are high.
The Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey put the 30-year fixed average at 6.71% for the week ending September 3, 2026, with the 15-year at 6.04%. A second mortgage prices above the first — it is subordinate, so it is riskier — and the gap is not published in any weekly survey. We have not put a number on it here, because there is no equivalent benchmark for second-lien pricing and inventing one would decide the comparison by assumption. Use an actual quote.
The structural point survives the missing number: PMI ends and the second mortgage does not. On a conventional loan the premium comes off automatically at 78% of original value, and can usually be requested at 80%. The second loan runs to term unless you refinance or pay it off. So a long hold favours the piggyback less than the first-year arithmetic suggests, and a short hold favours it more.
Three things the monthly comparison does not price
- ·The conforming limit. Splitting the debt can keep the first mortgage under the conforming ceiling — FHFA set the 2026 baseline one-unit limit at $832,750, with a high-cost-area ceiling of $1,249,125. On an expensive house that is sometimes the real reason to use a piggyback, and it does not show up as a monthly saving at all.
- ·Refinancing later is harder. A second lien has to agree to resubordinate before you can refinance the first. Lenders usually do, but it is a step, a fee, and occasionally a refusal.
- ·The tax treatment. IRS Publication 936 limits home mortgage interest to the first $750,000 of acquisition debt ($375,000 married filing separately). Note also that the same publication states the itemised deduction for mortgage insurance premiums has expired — so PMI carries no offsetting tax benefit, which is a point in the piggyback's favour that older comparisons get wrong.
That last item is worth dwelling on, because a great deal of writing on this topic predates the change and still credits PMI with deductibility. It has none. If a comparison you read anywhere treats mortgage insurance as partly tax-deductible, it is out of date and its conclusion is skewed toward the single loan.
Methodology
Both financing paths are amortised in full from the same purchase price, down payment and total debt, and compared month by month. The PMI premium starts at 0.55% (editable), the 700–719 credit-score rate at 85.01–90% LTV on a loan over 20 years on the published rate card this site's PMI calculator prices from, and cancellation follows the 80%-of-original-value convention. Second-lien rates are not assumed — enter a real quote. The conventional benchmark quoted is the Freddie Mac PMMS for the week ending September 3, 2026; conforming limits are FHFA's 2026 values; deduction limits are from IRS Publication 936.
Sources
- Freddie Mac — Primary Mortgage Market Survey (week ending September 3, 2026) — accessed 2026-09-07
- FHFA — Conforming Loan Limit Values for 2026 — accessed 2026-09-07
- IRS — Publication 936, Home Mortgage Interest Deduction — accessed 2026-09-07